Who writes, and how
The studio workflow uses AI-assisted research and drafting, followed by review of facts, sources, links and readability. The editorial byline is not a fictional expert or customer. Design concepts and websites we operate are labeled separately.
Sources and judgments
Platform guidance is linked to primary documentation where relevant. Design advice explains its context rather than presenting an opinion as a universal measured result. We do not invent testimonials or performance numbers to fill a page.
Updates and corrections
Original publication dates are retained. Modified dates change for substantive updates. A correction starts with checking the relevant fact, then updating both language versions. Use the contact page to identify a specific page and concern.
Local content
A service area is not an office. Area pages must explain the real service relationship and add useful context; we do not multiply near-identical pages by swapping city names. Public launch still requires final brand and business approval.
Visual explanations need context too
Figures should clarify a specific argument, not simply fill the layout. Conceptual diagrams are labeled as illustrations rather than measured data. Informative images need provenance, permission, captions and alternative text. Research notes, unapproved drafts and private assets stay outside public pages.
Drafting, review and generation are separate
New research articles follow a common evidence, structure and visual standard. Authoring interfaces can save, validate and submit drafts; the owner reviews the exact revision before website generation. Automated checks can catch structural problems, but do not prove a source, conclusion or image licence is correct.
Return to the journal